GeeCON Prague 2014*
The moose likes Beginning Java and the fly likes Why isn't Java's Object class abstract? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » Beginning Java
Bookmark "Why isn Watch "Why isn New topic
Author

Why isn't Java's Object class abstract?

singh manoj
Greenhorn

Joined: Mar 31, 2009
Posts: 2
Why isn't Java's Object class abstract?
Bear Bibeault
Author and ninkuma
Marshal

Joined: Jan 10, 2002
Posts: 61315
    
  66

"manoj.java singh", please check your private messages for an important administrative matter.

Also, please take the time to choose the correct forum for your posts. This forum is for questions on JBoss.

For more information, please read this.

This post has been moved to a more appropriate forum.


[Asking smart questions] [Bear's FrontMan] [About Bear] [Books by Bear]
Saifuddin Merchant
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 08, 2009
Posts: 605

Maybe it should have been abstract. I have no idea why its not though...


Cheers - Sam.
Twisters - The new age Java Quiz || My Blog
Campbell Ritchie
Sheriff

Joined: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 39076
    
  23
Because plain simple Objects are used by some classes.
Saifuddin Merchant
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 08, 2009
Posts: 605

Campbell Ritchie wrote:Because plain simple Objects are used by some classes.


They are ... But why? Just curious ...
Rob Spoor
Sheriff

Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Posts: 19697
    
  20

Check out this older thread: http://www.coderanch.com/t/432604/Java-General-intermediate/java/Discussion-why-java-lang-Object


SCJP 1.4 - SCJP 6 - SCWCD 5 - OCEEJBD 6
How To Ask Questions How To Answer Questions
 
GeeCON Prague 2014
 
subject: Why isn't Java's Object class abstract?