aspose file tools*
The moose likes Architect Certification (SCEA/OCMJEA) and the fly likes What to represent in the Part 2 diagrams ? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of EJB 3 in Action this week in the EJB and other Java EE Technologies forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Architect Certification (SCEA/OCMJEA)
Bookmark "What to represent in the Part 2 diagrams ?" Watch "What to represent in the Part 2 diagrams ?" New topic
Author

What to represent in the Part 2 diagrams ?

Benoît de Chateauvieux
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 10, 2007
Posts: 183
Hi All,

I'm wondering what to put in my class diagram.
I'm starting from the BDOM and modifying it:
  • I add new entities, change relations, etc.
  • I add business services that have dependencies with those entities.


  • But what about
    - presentation tier classes (like BackingBeans, for example)
    - business tier patterns that I may use (like TO)
    - or integration tier classes (like the shipping strategies) ?

    Will they appear in the component diagram or in the sequence diagrams ?
    What is the rule that defines where a component must appear in an architectural documentation ?

    Thanks for your help,

    Benoît


    SCJP5 | SCBCD5 | SCEA5 Part 1
     
    I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
     
    subject: What to represent in the Part 2 diagrams ?
     
    Similar Threads
    Part II - Viable Action Plan ?
    Part 2 assignment level of detail
    How many business delegate components??
    Incorrect/missing UML notation for interface/implementation on component diagram
    How much detail on the class diagram?