| Author |
limit result through JDBC
|
avihai marchiano
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jan 10, 2007
Posts: 342
|
|
I need to go other around 100,000 rows (row has 7 columns from join between tables) in bulk of 500-1000, do my process (around 20 sec for bulk) and take additional bulk ....
My question:
from performance perspective should i leave the result set open or for each bulk create result set and set beginning (by absolute ) at the end of the last bulk row?
I understand that when you use "absolute" the database iterate over all rows until this point , dosnt the database has any algorithm to do this without iterate over all rows?
Thank you
|
 |
Arunkumar Subramaniam
Greenhorn
Joined: Apr 08, 2009
Posts: 8
|
|
Hi
you can use SQL cached row result set for achive your goal
like :
Arunkumar S
|
 |
avihai marchiano
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jan 10, 2007
Posts: 342
|
|
|
If you have 1000 rows in the resultset, so it will copy all rows?
|
 |
Jeanne Boyarsky
internet detective
Marshal
Joined: May 26, 2003
Posts: 26201
|
|
|
Or you could use the SQL query itself to only return the rows you want to each connection is independent. Then you don't have to worry about using resources between requests. You could use rownum or the primary key of your table in the query.
|
[Blog] [JavaRanch FAQ] [How To Ask Questions The Smart Way] [Book Promos]
Blogging on Certs: SCEA Part 1, Part 2 & 3, Core Spring 3, OCAJP, OCPJP beta, TOGAF part 1 and part 2
|
 |
 |
|
|
subject: limit result through JDBC
|
|
|