This week's book giveaway is in the Jobs Discussion forum.
We're giving away four copies of Java Interview Guide and have Anthony DePalma on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes Game Development and the fly likes Does every image need to be a 'VolatileImage' in a 2d game? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login

Win a copy of Java Interview Guide this week in the Jobs Discussion forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » Game Development
Bookmark "Does every image need to be a Watch "Does every image need to be a New topic

Does every image need to be a 'VolatileImage' in a 2d game?

C Wang

Joined: Jun 05, 2009
Posts: 3
I'm a little confused about how VolatileImage s are supposed to be used.
Are they just for the 'main' image (the one you draw other images on) or should the other images (like sprite images) be VolatileImage as well?

for example i have 2 images 'screenimage' and 'enemyimage', and I draw enemyimage on to screenimage
if I want to use hardware acceleration on them should I just make screenimage a VolatileImage or should enemyimage be a VolatileImage too?
Marlon Drescher

Joined: Jun 20, 2011
Posts: 1
I have exactly the same question.
Free JAVA Action MMORPG!
Stephan van Hulst

Joined: Sep 20, 2010
Posts: 4642

Hi Marlon, welcome to CodeRanch.

You only need VolatileImage if you want hardware acceleration for your image. This is usually the case for offscreen rendering of a scene. Swing already takes care of most of this.

Just use BufferedImage, and only if performance is low, should you consider using a VolatileImage for rendering scenes. Static graphics objects should never use VolatileImage.

The mind is a strange and wonderful thing. I'm not sure that it will ever be able to figure itself out, everything else, maybe. From the atom to the universe, everything, except itself.
I agree. Here's the link:
subject: Does every image need to be a 'VolatileImage' in a 2d game?
It's not a secret anymore!