I have younger people coming over so I have decided that I would do something different and instead of entertaining them with the current crop of movies which I feel has not much to offer in terms of depth. I show them older films to instill in them an appreciation of fine cinema. I would like some suggestions from you all about some titles you recommend. I would like poverty and other plagues of society to be the main attraction of these pieces. Unless it doesn't have subtitles then just Hindi and English.
[ December 22, 2007: Message edited by: Arvind Birla ] [ December 22, 2007: Message edited by: Arvind Birla ]
Originally posted by Arvind Birla: ...I would like poverty and other plagues of society to be the main attraction of these pieces...
Interesting. On that subject matter, a few documentaries immediately come to mind:
Dark Days is about homeless people living in the tunnels of New York's subway system. These images and stories will stay with you.
Union Square is about heroin addicts (also homeless in New York). One of the best heroin films I've seen.
War Photographer is about photojournalist, James Nachtwey. This is particularly captivating because much of it is shot with a tiny video camera mounted on Nachtwey's camera, so we "see" what he's seeing while he works. His own commentary is very moving.
Brother's Keeper is about 4 reclusive brothers, barely able to function on an adult level, and the legal nightmare that ensures when one of them is found dead.
The True Meaning of Pictures is about a photographer and his controversial subject matter of dirt-poor, uneducated Appalachian families.
A Time for Burning is about a midwestern Lutheran church torn apart by the 1960's Civil Rights Movement.
But how old are these "younger" people? Some material in these documentaries is pretty intense. [ December 22, 2007: Message edited by: marc weber ]
"We're kind of on the level of crossword puzzle writers... And no one ever goes to them and gives them an award." ~Joe Strummer sscce.org
Originally posted by Arvind Birla: ...the current crop of movies which I feel has not much to offer in terms of depth...
I appreciate what you're saying, but I think there really are a lot of exciting things happening in film today. It's just that all the hype (money) around blockbusters tends to drown out these lower-budget, limited distribution films. On the topic of social ills, a couple of recent gems that come to mind are Virgil Bliss and Milk and Honey, both by Joe Maggio.
"To Kill a Mockingbird". I recently read an article that argued that Gregory Peck as Atticus Finch was one of the best matches of actor to role in the history of cinema. The movie deals with heavy issues like justice, poverty, and bigotry, but mostly seen through the eyes of Scout, Atticus's young daughter.
Joined: Jul 14, 2007
My library have none of these. You think it has something to do with the fact I live in India :roll: Anyhow I got some old Hindi black and white films. I must say Im fairly impressed with the quality. I guess it must be BollyWood's golden age. What surprised me more when I found alot of BollyWood music found popularity as far as Russia and Greece in the 40s and 50s.
Old Hollywood movies Ive seen and liked are Fiddler on the roof, Citizen Kane(but this is very overrated) ,Psycho.
Also I need you help remembering a B&W film I once caught on TV where the main character becomes a congressman and then tried to fight against the system against corruption or gets embroiled in some kind of a scandal?. Anyone know the name of this? The guy held the floor for many many hours in order to stall some kind of an event or a bill from passing. I saw this long time back, and don't remember who was in it but the main actor was brilliant in his portrayal.
Originally posted by Arvind Birla: ...Citizen Kane(but this is very overrated)...
I used to think Citizen Kane was a marginal curiosity, but after studying it in film classes, I think it's deserving of its status. On the other hand, it's difficult to appreciate without putting it in the context of its era; and because the film was so influential, its innovations don't stand out much today.
Without that context, it's still a great movie, but unless someone is studying film history, I probably wouldn't recommend it that strongly. [ January 07, 2008: Message edited by: marc weber ]