My Blog SCJP 5 SCWCD 5
At some website it is mentioned that scala is better than groovy. http://twittch.com/27/
SCJP 1.2 (89%), SCWCD 1.3 (94%), IBM 486 (90%), SCJA Beta (96%), SCEA (91% / 77%), SCEA 5 P1 (77%), SCBCD 5 (85%)
SCJP 1.2 (89%), SCWCD 1.3 (94%), IBM 486 (90%), SCJA Beta (96%), SCEA (91% / 77%), SCEA 5 P1 (77%), SCBCD 5 (85%)
SCJP 1.2 (89%), SCWCD 1.3 (94%), IBM 486 (90%), SCJA Beta (96%), SCEA (91% / 77%), SCEA 5 P1 (77%), SCBCD 5 (85%)
Does it means that Groovy will be not used so much because of scala.
SCJP 5.0, SCWCD 1.4, SCBCD 1.3, SCDJWS 1.4
My Blog
Vyas Sanzgiri wrote:No more new languages. I really believe new languages are created to confuse developers. What can I not achieve with Java :-)
Vyas Sanzgiri wrote:No more new languages. I really believe new languages are created to confuse developers. What can I not achieve with Java :-)
Trilochan Bharadwaj wrote:WE NEED CLOSURES IN JAVA! I don't understand why are we making such a fuss about closures being added to Java?
Good stuff, BTW never did SmallTalk but I hear people raving about it all the time (Martin Fowlers one of them), is it dynamic? anything closer to Scheme/ML/Haskell? (functional and static?) or is functional and dynamic or something else? just curious ...
David Newton wrote:Scala's lack of metaprogramming is a *real* issue for me, being used to languages with MOPs. I'm starting to use both Groovy and Scala more in day-to-day work (and have been using JRuby and Jython for years); they all seem to have their place. Neither is "better" in any useful objective sense.
David Newton wrote:
Vyas Sanzgiri wrote:No more new languages. I really believe new languages are created to confuse developers. What can I not achieve with Java :-)
Cleaner code.
===Vyas Sanzgiri===
My Blog