This week's book giveaway is in the Jobs Discussion forum.
We're giving away four copies of Customer Requirements for Developers and have Marcho Behler on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes EJB Certification (SCBCD/OCPJBCD) and the fly likes Bidirectional - Only one @JoinColumn Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login

Win a copy of Customer Requirements for Developers this week in the Jobs Discussion forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » EJB Certification (SCBCD/OCPJBCD)
Bookmark "Bidirectional - Only one @JoinColumn" Watch "Bidirectional - Only one @JoinColumn" New topic

Bidirectional - Only one @JoinColumn

Sandeep Vaid
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 27, 2006
Posts: 392
"Note that you do not have to define @JoinColumn in the entities of both sides of one-to-one relationships."
Does this mean that we "Do Not Have To" OR "We Can't" define @JoinColumn in the entities of both sides of one-to-one

Moreover [P-279p Of EJB3 In Action Book States:
"Note that the exact @JoinColumn specification could have been repeated for both the Bid.item and Item.bids
persistent fields on either side of the relationship."

The contradiction of this statement is @ [P-280]
"The persistence provider will generate deployment-time errors if you specify @JoinColumn on both sides of a
bidirectional one-to-many relationship."

Does this mean repetation of @JoinColumn is allowed in "OneToMany - ManyToOne" case but not allowed in bidirectional
"OneToOne" ?
I agree. Here's the link:
subject: Bidirectional - Only one @JoinColumn
jQuery in Action, 3rd edition