aspose file tools*
The moose likes EJB and other Java EE Technologies and the fly likes MDB Vs  Message Listener performance Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » EJB and other Java EE Technologies
Bookmark "MDB Vs  Message Listener performance " Watch "MDB Vs  Message Listener performance " New topic
Author

MDB Vs Message Listener performance

kri shan
Ranch Hand

Joined: Apr 08, 2004
Posts: 1382
JMS destination(either only one Queue or only one Topic) delivers message to the particular MDB instance deployed in the EJB container. (If we need
to deliver multiple messages simultaneously, then we can instantiate multpile MDB instances )

But if we use simple JMS listener, we can send multiple JMS destination( more than one Queue and Topic) delivers messages to the JMS consumer.
EJB container provides concurrent request to the MDB(Scalability), transaction, security and MDB life cycle management.

Which gives best performance MDB (needs EJB container, but takes care many of the features like Transaction, security, etc) or JMS consumer(no need of
EJB container, we have to take care all the EJB container provided services ?
kri shan
Ranch Hand

Joined: Apr 08, 2004
Posts: 1382
Any update ?
kri shan
Ranch Hand

Joined: Apr 08, 2004
Posts: 1382
reply ?
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: MDB Vs Message Listener performance