| Author |
why is @Remove not working
|
Ravi Kiran Va
Ranch Hand
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Posts: 2234
|
|
Hi ,
Hi ,
I have coded a ejb3 stateless session bean as shown
Please tell me why CallBackMethod() is not getting called called . Do you need to do any configurations ??
Thank you .
|
Save India From Corruption - Anna Hazare.
|
 |
Mark E Hansen
Ranch Hand
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
Posts: 639
|
|
@Remove only makes sense for statefull session beans, not stateless. In the case of a stateless session bean, as soon as the call is finished, the bean is placed back in the pool (or destroyed).
However, for a statefull session bean, the bean maintains its conversational state until it times out. The @Remove annotation is how you (the bean designer) can tell the container that the session is over and the bean can be recycled.
I hope this helps,
|
 |
Mark E Hansen
Ranch Hand
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
Posts: 639
|
|
I've had another read of your original question and I think I see there was some confusion.
The @Remove annotation does not indicate that a method is a call-back. It simply says that the statefull session bean should be recycled after this method call finished.
For example, assume you have a statefull session bean with 4 methods: doStep1(), doStep2(), doStep3() and doStep4(). The bean should retain conversational state throughout all the steps. However, after the application calls doStep4(), it is finished with this bean. Using the @Remove annotation, you tell the container to recycle the bean after this method call is finished.
Without the @Remove annotation on that method, the bean would persist (and take up valuable resources) until it times out.
I think what you're looking for, however, is the @PreDestroy annotation. This can be used on any bean (stateless/statefull session and MDB) and annotates a method (public, private, etc.) as a callback for the lifecycle event.
Sorry I went off-track with my first response - my brain was stuck on the @Remove annotation rather than what you were actually asking
|
 |
Ravi Kiran Va
Ranch Hand
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Posts: 2234
|
|
|
Thank you for the answer and for the KT with @Remove annotation .
|
 |
Mark E Hansen
Ranch Hand
Joined: Apr 01, 2009
Posts: 639
|
|
Ravi Kiran V wrote:Thank you for the answer and for the KT with @Remove annotation .
KT?
|
 |
Ravi Kiran Va
Ranch Hand
Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Posts: 2234
|
|
|
Knowledge Transfer
|
 |
 |
|
|
subject: why is @Remove not working
|
|
|