This week's book giveaway is in the Design forum.
We're giving away four copies of Building Microservices and have Sam Newman on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes Architect Certification (SCEA/OCMJEA) and the fly likes Part II Query on solving problem domain Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login

Win a copy of Building Microservices this week in the Design forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Architect Certification (SCEA/OCMJEA)
Bookmark "Part II Query on solving problem domain" Watch "Part II Query on solving problem domain" New topic

Part II Query on solving problem domain

Riyaz Enayath
Ranch Hand

Joined: Sep 01, 2009
Posts: 33

I have some confusions on the solution approach. Please corret me if I'm wrong in the following.

(i) If certain cardinalities, relationships are unclear in the given BDM , can we fix those problem areas by identifying and providing valid assumption as the solution or can it be only solved through UML diagram?

(ii)Can I make the changes(ex: In order management domain, changing the entity 'manufacturer' as attribute to 'product' entity) in the given BDM entities in order to depict them properly in class diagram solution?

(iii)Does the assumption point get marked if solution is not fully shown in UML compliance or it lead to failure of whole deliverables?

Kindly share your suggestions.

I’ve looked at a lot of different solutions, and in my humble opinion Aspose is the way to go. Here’s the link:
subject: Part II Query on solving problem domain
jQuery in Action, 3rd edition