A confirmation required about interfaces...

[Abimaran Kugathasan]

That is, We can put any access modifiers(public, protected, default, private) to interface? Please confirm? Then what about the non-access modifiers? Only abstract??

[Ankit Garg]

Why do you want us to confirm it when you can compile and check it??

[Heba Mahmoud]

only public and abstract modifiers are premeited for interface "top level interface"

but for interfaces that defined in classes what access modifiers is valid for it........ " no restrication " as in the example
as inner classes.

  
class TestInterface{
	  
	 private interface inter0 {}
	 protected  interface inter1 {}
	 public  interface inter2  extends inter1{}
	 private interface inter3 {}
	 static interface inter00{}

	 public class X implements inter0,inter1,inter2,inter3{
		 
	 }
 }
  

[Abimaran Kugathasan]

Ankit Garg wrote:

Why do you want us to confirm it when you can compile and check it??

Yea, correct.

Thanks a lot Heba Mahmoud for you valuable information...

[Abimaran Kugathasan]

What about default modifier for the interfaces? Because, It's said in the K&B's book, that.....

........

public abstract interface Rollable {}
public interface Rollable {}

The public modifier is required if you want the interface to have public rather than default access......

Here the keyword abstract is redundant, But what about public, Is every interfaces are implicitly public?? No?? There are default interfaces?? Somebody confirm? Thanks in Advanced!

[Ankit Garg]

Abimaran Kugathasan wrote:Is every interfaces are implicitly public?? No?? There are default interfaces?? Somebody confirm?

Again you can create an interface in one package and don't make it public and try to access it in a different package and you'll get your answer...