| Author |
Synchronization Issue
|
Aron Daburn
Ranch Hand
Joined: Mar 18, 2007
Posts: 36
|
|
Here's a riddle for you all.
The Setup:
I have function A and function B. I want function A and B to be synchronized within object O. Multiple threads will be accessing object O. When function B is running, no function As will be running and vice-versa.
The Problem:
Function A should not stop another function A from running. Simply having a lock for A and B will cause one A to lock out another A. How do you synchronize A and B together without locking multiple threads on A?
|
 |
Henry Wong
author
Sheriff
Joined: Sep 28, 2004
Posts: 16682
|
|
Do you only want this functionality with A? And not B?
If so, you can use a reader writer lock -- java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantReadWriteLock. Have method A grab the reader lock, and have method B grab the writer lock.
Henry
|
Books: Java Threads, 3rd Edition, Jini in a Nutshell, and Java Gems (contributor)
|
 |
Jim Hoglund
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jan 09, 2008
Posts: 525
|
|
I want function A and B to be synchronized within object O...
If functions A and B are guaranteed to run at different times,
controlled by other factors, apparently, why do you want them
to be synchronized?
Jim ...
|
BEE MBA PMP SCJP-6
|
 |
Aron Daburn
Ranch Hand
Joined: Mar 18, 2007
Posts: 36
|
|
Henry, a read/write lock seems to be exactly what I am looking for, thanks!
I have an object O that establishes a connection with a server and requests are rean through that object. To not have each thread have performance hit of initializing a connection, I am caching that object and having each thread simply call the get request (object O is thread safe to handle simultaneous get requests). My code needs to reinitialize the connection after X get requests which means when one thread is reinitializing the connection, no get requests should proceed. So, I think a read/write lock will be perfect for this.
|
 |
 |
|
|
subject: Synchronization Issue
|
|
|