may be, this question want to test the knowledge of full qualified name of MessageListener rather than usage of @MessageDriven annotation.
Also, one more reason that i can think of is that may be you are solving the questions based on EJB 2.1 (or less) version where EJB annotations were not present.
Oracle Java Web Service Developer (1z0-897), Oracle certified Java 7 Programmer, SCJA 1.0, SCJP 5.0, SCWCD 5.0, Oracle SQL Fundamentals I, CIW Certified Ecommerce specialist
Joined: Feb 18, 2007
Supposing that I am aware of the MessageListener's class' fully qualified name, still according to the question, I don't think any snippet correctly defines a MDB. Especially since no xml descriptor is present, which can define the POJO to be an MDB.
I think, specifying the @MessageDriven annotation is also equally important, other than implement MessageListener to call a POJO as an MDB.
Hi guys, I most agree with Prasad, the answer 1 is nearly correct but it does not have any kind of information about the MDB environment (e.g. the destination type, acknowledge, mesageSelector) and, I presume that there is dd somewhere.
The Question is to fuzzy and if I use use the information what they provide then none of the answers are correct - for 1 it mss the info about the mdb.