Any body working or worked on Factory Homes assignment?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at by srikanth kakumanu
John Wenn
Ranch Hand
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Posts: 31
posted
0
I'm working on it...
srikanth kakumanu
Greenhorn
Joined: Sep 16, 2003
Posts: 8
posted
0
John Wenn wrote:I'm working on it...
Hi John,
Can you check your Private messages once please?
What are the technologies you are using for this assign? I am thinking to use the JSP, JSF, EJB 3, JPA. What do you say?
There is lot of confusion about the domain model relationships. Isn;t it?
John Wenn
Ranch Hand
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Posts: 31
posted
0
srikanth kakumanu wrote:
John Wenn wrote:I'm working on it...
Hi John,
Can you check your Private messages once please?
What are the technologies you are using for this assign? I am thinking to use the JSP, JSF, EJB 3, JPA. What do you say?
There is lot of confusion about the domain model relationships. Isn;t it?
Those technologies are okey.. you can use those.. read it carefully and identify what are the potential requirements, "strong visual feedback" to the client.. + scalability is not prioritize. and read this book (specially chapter 9) Prentice Hall Sun Certified Enterprise Architect for Java EE Study Guide
srikanth kakumanu
Greenhorn
Joined: Sep 16, 2003
Posts: 8
posted
0
John Wenn wrote:
srikanth kakumanu wrote:
John Wenn wrote:I'm working on it...
Hi John,
Can you check your Private messages once please?
What are the technologies you are using for this assign? I am thinking to use the JSP, JSF, EJB 3, JPA. What do you say?
There is lot of confusion about the domain model relationships. Isn;t it?
Those technologies are okey.. you can use those.. read it carefully and identify what are the potential requirements, "strong visual feedback" to the client.. + scalability is not prioritize. and read this book (specially chapter 9) Prentice Hall Sun Certified Enterprise Architect for Java EE Study Guide
Hi John,
As you suggested, i have ordered for this book. Thank you.
Do we need to show JSF backing beans and listeners in our component, class, sequence diagrams?
John Wenn
Ranch Hand
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Posts: 31
posted
0
No I don't think so, their requirement is not a detailed design.Try to make it simple as you can but remember to focus on solving the business problem.
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at by John Wenn
srikanth kakumanu
Greenhorn
Joined: Sep 16, 2003
Posts: 8
posted
0
John Wenn wrote:
No I don't think so, their requirement is not a detailed design.Try to make it simple as you can but remember to focus on solving the business problem.
Could you please check your private messages once?
Javier Ruiz
Greenhorn
Joined: Aug 20, 2010
Posts: 3
posted
0
Hello.
I am a bit confused about the UC Search Component Catalog.
When it says "System respond with the product detail and availability/applicability of the product based on the current house design", what does it means?
A) System respond with the basic component detail (product detail=component detail) and availability/applicability (component has stock and it is included into the valid component combinations for this house design)
B) System respond with the house detail (maybe a 3D tool view including the last selected component) and the availability/applicability of all the components of the house design. In this case product detail = house detail.
What do you think?
Regards.
Luke Murphy
Ranch Hand
Joined: May 12, 2010
Posts: 291
posted
0
Javier Ruiz wrote:Hello.
I am a bit confused about the UC Search Component Catalog.
When it says "System respond with the product detail and availability/applicability of the product based on the current house design", what does it means?
A) System respond with the basic component detail (product detail=component detail) and availability/applicability (component has stock and it is included into the valid component combinations for this house design)
B) System respond with the house detail (maybe a 3D tool view including the last selected component) and the availability/applicability of all the components of the house design. In this case product detail = house detail.
What do you think?
Regards.
Hi,
I am doing this assignment as well right now :-)
Luke.
Saurabh Deshpande
Ranch Hand
Joined: Aug 09, 2007
Posts: 33
posted
0
Hi Javier,
As per my understanding it means
A) System respond with the basic component detail (product detail=component detail) and availability/applicability (component has stock and it is included into the valid component combinations for this house design)
Saurabh Deshpande.
Saurabh Deshpande.
SCJP, SCWCD, SCEA Part 1
Doing Part 2 now....
Robert Siqueira
Greenhorn
Joined: Jan 21, 2008
Posts: 26
posted
0
I'm working in Factory Homes too, and, one point isnt clear for me.
What "applicability" means ? If I try to add a component, what inventory system should validate ?? I really didnt understand this. For me is clear that Inventory System should answer me if that component has stock.
Regards,
Robert
Javier Ruiz
Greenhorn
Joined: Aug 20, 2010
Posts: 3
posted
0
Hello.
I supose "Applicable" means that the partial design (incluiding the last component added) doesn´t include a non-valid component. It must be validated in the ISM.
Regards.
Javier Ruiz
Greenhorn
Joined: Aug 20, 2010
Posts: 3
posted
0
Saurabh Deshpande wrote:Hi Javier,
As per my understanding it means
A) System respond with the basic component detail (product detail=component detail) and availability/applicability (component has stock and it is included into the valid component combinations for this house design)
Saurabh Deshpande.
Thanks Saurabh.
Robert Siqueira
Greenhorn
Joined: Jan 21, 2008
Posts: 26
posted
0
Javier Ruiz wrote:Hello.
I supose "Applicable" means that the partial design (incluiding the last component added) doesn´t include a non-valid component. It must be validated in the ISM.
Regards.
What means a non-valid component ? Could you give me a example ?
Regards,
Robert
chiku awasthi
Greenhorn
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Posts: 26
posted
0
Hi,
If components are taken seperately from a component catalogue (let's say) it's not guaranteed that a component will fit into all the house designs .
For instance you can't fit a swiming pool or garage into an appartment house design .
Regards,
Chiku.
Robert Siqueira
Greenhorn
Joined: Jan 21, 2008
Posts: 26
posted
0
chiku awasthi wrote:Hi,
If components are taken seperately from a component catalogue (let's say) it's not guaranteed that a component will fit into all the house designs .
For instance you can't fit a swiming pool or garage into an appartment house design .
Regards,
Chiku.
Thanks Chiku for your reply. Just one more question. My understood is that the system already have basic houses, I mean, when the customer enters in the system, is presented a basic house ("factory homes has patented a unique modular construction that allows the base house components......") and the customer can change it and in the end his/her can complete it. So, in that case, I could have a house persisted to be possible to show the user.
what do you think ?
Regards,
Robert
chiku awasthi
Greenhorn
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Posts: 26
posted
0
yes there could be persisted house design , but could be very basic or abstract , not necessarily complete.
The whole idea of having houses composed of components does not hold good if you have house persisted.
Also concept of design ( abstract/incomplete house ) does not hold if you start persisting houses , it all depends on
your perception of domain model , as not to persist house is not explicitly stated in the assignment you can persist
house design.