Win a copy of Re-engineering Legacy Software this week in the Refactoring forum
or Docker in Action in the Cloud/Virtualization forum!
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

Doubt in Basic Profile 1.1

 
udaykumar maddigatla
Ranch Hand
Posts: 69
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi

Can some one please explain these lines whcih are there Basic Profile 1.1

  • A document-literal binding in a DESCRIPTION MUST NOT have the namespace attribute specified on contained soapbind:body, soapbind:header, soapbind:headerfault and soapbind:fault elements.


  • An rpc-literal binding in a DESCRIPTION MUST have the namespace attribute specified, the value of which MUST be an absolute URI, on contained soapbind:body elements.


  • An rpc-literal binding in a DESCRIPTION MUST NOT have the namespace attribute specified on contained soapbind:header, soapbind:headerfault and soapbind:fault elements.
  •  
    Ivan Krizsan
    Ranch Hand
    Posts: 2198
    1
    • Mark post as helpful
    • send pies
    • Quote
    • Report post to moderator
    Hi!
    Have you read the comments in the Basic Profile?
    They can be found here: http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1.html#Namespaces_for_soapbind_Elements
    It boils down to an XML namespace of the element in question being necessary or not and is intended, as far as I understand, to avoid confusion about what namespace is being assigned an element.
    Best wishes!
     
    • Post Reply
    • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
    • New Topic