wood burning stoves*
The moose likes Web Services Certification (SCDJWS/OCEJWSD) and the fly likes Doubt in Basic Profile 1.1 Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of Java 8 in Action this week in the Java 8 forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Web Services Certification (SCDJWS/OCEJWSD)
Bookmark "Doubt in Basic Profile 1.1" Watch "Doubt in Basic Profile 1.1" New topic
Author

Doubt in Basic Profile 1.1

udaykumar maddigatla
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 03, 2009
Posts: 69
Hi

Can some one please explain these lines whcih are there Basic Profile 1.1

  • A document-literal binding in a DESCRIPTION MUST NOT have the namespace attribute specified on contained soapbind:body, soapbind:header, soapbind:headerfault and soapbind:fault elements.


  • An rpc-literal binding in a DESCRIPTION MUST have the namespace attribute specified, the value of which MUST be an absolute URI, on contained soapbind:body elements.


  • An rpc-literal binding in a DESCRIPTION MUST NOT have the namespace attribute specified on contained soapbind:header, soapbind:headerfault and soapbind:fault elements.


  • SCJP 5.0(84%), SCWCD 5.0(97%), SCDJWS 5.0(98%)
    Ivan Krizsan
    Ranch Hand

    Joined: Oct 04, 2006
    Posts: 2198
        
        1
    Hi!
    Have you read the comments in the Basic Profile?
    They can be found here: http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1.html#Namespaces_for_soapbind_Elements
    It boils down to an XML namespace of the element in question being necessary or not and is intended, as far as I understand, to avoid confusion about what namespace is being assigned an element.
    Best wishes!
     
    Don't get me started about those stupid light bulbs.
     
    subject: Doubt in Basic Profile 1.1
     
    Similar Threads
    rpc/encoded - is a WS standard?
    Clarification sought on the Basic profile
    Where to find encoding
    WSDL schema verification
    Doubt in Ivan's book