File APIs for Java Developers
Manipulate DOC, XLS, PPT, PDF and many others from your application.
http://aspose.com/file-tools
The moose likes HTML, CSS and JavaScript and the fly likes Opinions on Dojo / Dijit Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of The Java EE 7 Tutorial Volume 1 or Volume 2 this week in the Java EE forum
or jQuery UI in Action in the JavaScript forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Engineering » HTML, CSS and JavaScript
Bookmark "Opinions on Dojo / Dijit" Watch "Opinions on Dojo / Dijit" New topic
Author

Opinions on Dojo / Dijit

Gregg Bolinger
GenRocket Founder
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Posts: 15299
    
    6

Currently, I'm a huge jQuery fan and I've been using jQueryUI pretty heavily over the last 4 months or so on a particular project. The more I use jQueryUI the more I hate it. I still love jQuery but jQueryUI is clearly an afterthought, in my opinion.

I've been casually looking for something better and I've been running through the Dojo Dijit docs and examples a bit today. I'm curious what others currently think about Dojo and the Dijit libraries. I've heard that older versions of Dojo were horrible but their newer version is quite a bit better.

BTW, please don't recommend other toolkits / libraries. I want to keep this discussion really focused.

Thanks.


GenRocket - Experts at Building Test Data
David Newton
Author
Rancher

Joined: Sep 29, 2008
Posts: 12617

I find the docs lacking, but in terms of functionality and design, it's not bad. I might consider YUI instead, though.

Oops.

(I also get quite frustrated with jQueryUI, which is too bad.)
Gregg Bolinger
GenRocket Founder
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Posts: 15299
    
    6

David Newton wrote:I find the docs lacking


Really? I've found them to be pretty good, at the very least, compared to jQueryUI docs.
David Newton
Author
Rancher

Joined: Sep 29, 2008
Posts: 12617

That's... high praise indeed.

</sarcasm>
Bear Bibeault
Author and ninkuma
Marshal

Joined: Jan 10, 2002
Posts: 61082
    
  66

jQuery UI is not under the control of John Resig, and it shows. As it stands, Part II of jQuery in Action (2nd edition) is the only complete and accurate documentation for jQuery UI.

[Asking smart questions] [Bear's FrontMan] [About Bear] [Books by Bear]
Ravi Kiran Va
Ranch Hand

Joined: Apr 18, 2009
Posts: 2234

To be frank , JQuery sucks and DOJO is best .


Save India From Corruption - Anna Hazare.
Gregg Bolinger
GenRocket Founder
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Posts: 15299
    
    6

Ravi Kiran V wrote:To be frank , JQuery sucks and DOJO is best .


That is 100% unhelpful.
Bear Bibeault
Author and ninkuma
Marshal

Joined: Jan 10, 2002
Posts: 61082
    
  66

Ravi Kiran V wrote:To be frank , JQuery sucks and DOJO is best .

You just make yourself look silly with such ridiculous posts.

Both jQuery and Dojo are fine libraries. I prefer the former for it's lightweight-edness and ease of use.
David Newton
Author
Rancher

Joined: Sep 29, 2008
Posts: 12617

Ravi Kiran V wrote:To be frank , JQuery sucks and DOJO is best .

Why?
Gennady Oster
Greenhorn

Joined: Aug 29, 2010
Posts: 1
If it may be helpful for you, here is my experience.

Several times on different OS during the last year I tried to run the dijit samples with no luck. The best result was - it simply didn't work. In the worst case my IE failed and I had to reload the desktop. Think, I could find the reason and to run it finally. But for what ? If the site that is aimed to demostrate the abilities of the library (including browser independency by the way) fails from the very beginning, what the hell else I need ?

Regards,
Gennady
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: Opinions on Dojo / Dijit