aspose file tools*
The moose likes Web Component Certification (SCWCD/OCPJWCD) and the fly likes On the exam, is it ok to consider autoboxing is on? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of EJB 3 in Action this week in the EJB and other Java EE Technologies forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Web Component Certification (SCWCD/OCPJWCD)
Bookmark "On the exam, is it ok to consider autoboxing is on?" Watch "On the exam, is it ok to consider autoboxing is on?" New topic
Author

On the exam, is it ok to consider autoboxing is on?

Malika Ben Aziz
Greenhorn

Joined: Oct 26, 2009
Posts: 23


Hi folks



If we assume we're using java 1.4, is wrong because there is no autoboxing.

The exam title says Sun Certified Web Component Developer for the Java Platform, Enterprise Edition 5
But the jsp is 2.0 which is still java 1.4


On the real exam, what sohould I consider please?
Frits Walraven
Creator of Enthuware JWS+ V6
Bartender

Joined: Apr 07, 2010
Posts: 1518
    
  22

Hi Malika,

see previous thread

Regards,
Frits
Abimaran Kugathasan
Ranch Hand

Joined: Nov 04, 2009
Posts: 2066

I think, answer is A. Please confirm!


|BSc in Electronic Eng| |SCJP 6.0 91%| |SCWCD 5 92%|
Ankit Garg
Sheriff

Joined: Aug 03, 2008
Posts: 9280
    
  17

Abimaran, yes A is correct option...


SCJP 6 | SCWCD 5 | Javaranch SCJP FAQ | SCWCD Links
Abimaran Kugathasan
Ranch Hand

Joined: Nov 04, 2009
Posts: 2066

Thanks! Ankit!
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: On the exam, is it ok to consider autoboxing is on?
 
Similar Threads
Autboxing & SCWCD for J2EE 5
statement not reachable??
primitive as attribute
autoboxing available in SCWCD5?
Reference variable casting w.r.t interfaces