The moose likes Beginning Java and the fly likes parantheses in explicit casting Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » Beginning Java
Bookmark "parantheses in explicit casting" Watch "parantheses in explicit casting" New topic

parantheses in explicit casting

saravanan ragunathan
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 02, 2010
Posts: 84

when i use explicit casting without outer parantheses (Dog) animal.eat(); instead of ((Dog) animal).eat();
i am getting compilation error...what these parantheses tell to the compiler..how the compiler understand
this explicit casting with and without outer parantheses

"I Love Java Ranch"
Ankit Garg

Joined: Aug 03, 2008
Posts: 9291

If you write (Dog) animal.eat(), it means you are trying to typecast the value returned by the eat method to Dog type. But the eat method has void return type thus it doesn't return anything so you can't typecast it...

SCJP 6 | SCWCD 5 | Javaranch SCJP FAQ | SCWCD Links
Matthew Brown

Joined: Apr 06, 2010
Posts: 4343

It's to do with the precedence. The "." operator has higher precedence than the cast, so it is performed first unless you put an extra set of brackets in. That's why you get the behaviour Ankit describes.
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
subject: parantheses in explicit casting
Similar Threads
Inheritence and Typecasting in java
Doubt on Over-ridden code
Overriden and Overriding Methods Declaration Conundrum.
Generics Help please !