File APIs for Java Developers
Manipulate DOC, XLS, PPT, PDF and many others from your application.
The moose likes JavaFX and the fly likes arguments for Java FX Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » JavaFX
Bookmark "arguments for Java FX" Watch "arguments for Java FX" New topic

arguments for Java FX

Marco Schrank

Joined: Mar 05, 2011
Posts: 5


I plan to use javafx for some online tools, where I need a sophisticated gui.
I had several silverlight vs. javafx discussions with my coworkers who are more ms affine.
My javafx pro arguments are
-platform independece
-more or less not proprietary
-access to the java ecosystem
-interesting gui concept
It would be great if someone could give me some more ammunition for the next round.

Jesus Angeles
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 26, 2005
Posts: 2068
Flex is not an option?
Mohamed Sanaulla
Saloon Keeper

Joined: Sep 08, 2007
Posts: 3152

- Supports Mobile platform.
- Can be used easily in place of the applets.

Mohamed Sanaulla | My Blog
Jesus Angeles
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 26, 2005
Posts: 2068
One fact is that you are comparing a microsoft product versus one that is not.

With javafx:

advantage: support of the community, and vendors, who all participate in its growth as a technology
disadvantage: a relatively new technology (just like java 1.2 in its days)
disadvantage: if you have existing java (non-javafx) libraries, you will either use it 'natively' removing platform-independence, or rewrite the whole library in javafx codes

with silverlight:

I honestly dont know anything about it. But for developer support, and vendor support, and non-lock-and-stiff-and-pay-with-microsoft thing, I would consider javafx instead. If pretty gui (flash) is important, and you have a java server, you can look at flex.
I agree. Here's the link:
subject: arguments for Java FX
It's not a secret anymore!