Champ, you are going to find this number in your instructions.html file. I don't have mine here right now, but I remember it appears at the top of the document. It must be something like 1.3.1 or 1.3.2 or 1.3.3.
Roberto Perillo wrote:I remember it appears at the top of the document.
It doesn't anymore. I got my assignment two weeks ago. No 'instructions.html' is provided, the assignment is described on a prometric survey page (and you are instructed to save this page). I was able to check my version by comparing method signatures from http://www.coderanch.com/how-to/java/ScjdFaq
Oh, right! I forgot today you just receive an email with the instructions... isn't there something in the body of the email that identifies the version number? If not, then one way is to do what you did. But my only concern is that these signatures may have changed, as well as the whole process...
Roberto Perillo wrote:you just receive an email with the instructions... isn't there something in the body of the email that identifies the version number?
No e-mail, just the online survey, which seems to me contained a bad copy-paste version of the original 'instructions.html'.
And I do mean bad . Some sections of the instructions were given proper headings (bigger text and bold), other sections just began in line after a previous section. Worse, the line describing the desired usage:
was rendered as
... obviously because of the inequality signs surrounding <path_and_filename> and <mode>.
It was also a pain to figure out where the sentences describing the database fields started and ended.
Only by looking at the source HTML, I was able to decipher it all. Maybe there is a new objective for the OCMJD, which requires you to be able to handle badly formatted specs?
Anyway, back on topic: I could not find a version number anywhere...