Win a copy of Design for the Mind this week in the Design forum!
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

Message selector versus Temporary Queues

 
Senthil Kumar
Ranch Hand
Posts: 264
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi,
My system calls an external JMS system synchronously. Which would perform better in this scenario, expecially when the load is quite high, say nearly 6000 users synchronously listening to the extenal Queue(one static queue with message selector/x nos of temporary queue). Anyone have done this in their project.
 
Jeanne Boyarsky
author & internet detective
Marshal
Posts: 34178
340
Eclipse IDE Java VI Editor
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
While having six thousand queues seems like a bad idea, using the same queue for so many purposes doesn't sound better. Maybe just I've never used queues on the scale though and that's why it feels off.
 
Jorge Coll
Greenhorn
Posts: 8
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi,

I think that temporary queues on a well config cluster could be the best solution. As I understand so many concurrent threads working with message selectors could have the wrost performance.
 
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic