This week's giveaway is in the EJB and other Java EE Technologies forum. We're giving away four copies of EJB 3 in Action and have Debu Panda, Reza Rahman, Ryan Cuprak, and Michael Remijan on-line! See this thread for details.
My system calls an external JMS system synchronously. Which would perform better in this scenario, expecially when the load is quite high, say nearly 6000 users synchronously listening to the extenal Queue(one static queue with message selector/x nos of temporary queue). Anyone have done this in their project.
when you really want something, all the universe always conspires in your favour.<br /> <br />SCJP1.5-77%<br />SCWCD-89%
While having six thousand queues seems like a bad idea, using the same queue for so many purposes doesn't sound better. Maybe just I've never used queues on the scale though and that's why it feels off.