aspose file tools*
The moose likes EJB and other Java EE Technologies and the fly likes Message selectors versus Temporary Queues Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » EJB and other Java EE Technologies
Bookmark "Message selectors versus Temporary Queues" Watch "Message selectors versus Temporary Queues" New topic
Author

Message selectors versus Temporary Queues

Senthil Kumar
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 13, 2006
Posts: 264
Hi,
My system calls an external JMS system synchronously. Which would perform better in this scenario, expecially when the load is quite high, say nearly 6000 users synchronously listening to the extenal Queue(one static queue with message selector/x nos of temporary queue). Anyone have done this in their project.


when you really want something, all the universe always conspires in your favour.<br /> <br />SCJP1.5-77%<br />SCWCD-89%
Madhan Sundararajan Devaki
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 18, 2011
Posts: 312

I believe, Temporary Queues would perform better and also be capable of handling higher loads in future.


S.D. MADHAN
Not many get the right opportunity !
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: Message selectors versus Temporary Queues
 
Similar Threads
Pausing/suspending Message consumption in weblogic 9.2
setjmsreply in JMS
Message selector versus Temporary Queues
Visibility of Temporary Queues outide of its MOM
JMS Question