wood burning stoves
The moose likes EJB and other Java EE Technologies and the fly likes Message selectors versus Temporary Queues Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login

Win a copy of Make it so: Java DB Connections & Transactions this week in the JDBC forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » EJB and other Java EE Technologies
Bookmark "Message selectors versus Temporary Queues" Watch "Message selectors versus Temporary Queues" New topic

Message selectors versus Temporary Queues

Senthil Kumar
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 13, 2006
Posts: 264
My system calls an external JMS system synchronously. Which would perform better in this scenario, expecially when the load is quite high, say nearly 6000 users synchronously listening to the extenal Queue(one static queue with message selector/x nos of temporary queue). Anyone have done this in their project.

when you really want something, all the universe always conspires in your favour.<br /> <br />SCJP1.5-77%<br />SCWCD-89%
Madhan Sundararajan Devaki
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 18, 2011
Posts: 312

I believe, Temporary Queues would perform better and also be capable of handling higher loads in future.

Not many get the right opportunity !
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
subject: Message selectors versus Temporary Queues
It's not a secret anymore!