• Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

Can C++0X concurrency be implemented only as a library?

 
Orjan Petersson
Greenhorn
Posts: 12
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Anthony,
I understand I can get a C++0X thread library (like yours :-) to start using the new C++ multithreading features with my current compiler.
However, I suppose there are the other C++0X concurrency features for which I need a new version of the compiler. If so, what are those?

Best regards,
Örjan Petersson
 
Anthony Aj Williams
author
Ranch Hand
Posts: 57
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Orjan Petersson wrote:Anthony,
I understand I can get a C++0X thread library (like yours :-) to start using the new C++ multithreading features with my current compiler.
However, I suppose there are the other C++0X concurrency features for which I need a new version of the compiler. If so, what are those?


The key concurrency feature which cannot be implemented as a library is the thread_local keyword. My library provides a macro (JSS_THREAD_LOCAL()) which emulates this facility in some contexts, but it cannot provide a general solution, and requires you to use a macro rather than a keyword.

The use of constexpr to guarantee static initialization for objects of class type (such as std::mutex) cannot be emulated either. In some cases the compiler will naturally do the required static initialization as part of normal optimization, but in others it will generate dynamic initialization code to call the relevant constructor.
 
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic