| Author |
Visibility attributes in UML diagrams
|
Joao Bosco Jares
Ranch Hand
Joined: May 13, 2011
Posts: 40
|
|
Hi Friends,
I am working with a UML Tool that use icons in place of the visibility attributes, such as one icon for "+", "-" and "#" visibilities. Any can tell me if it can represents a problem for the assignment?
Best regards,
|
 |
Jeanne Boyarsky
internet detective
Marshal
Joined: May 26, 2003
Posts: 26184
|
|
|
That's not very standard. Not sure if it would be wise to risk it. What UML tool is it?
|
[Blog] [JavaRanch FAQ] [How To Ask Questions The Smart Way] [Book Promos]
Blogging on Certs: SCEA Part 1, Part 2 & 3, Core Spring 3, OCAJP, OCPJP beta, TOGAF part 1 and part 2
|
 |
Joao Bosco Jares
Ranch Hand
Joined: May 13, 2011
Posts: 40
|
|
Jeanne Boyarsky wrote:That's not very standard. Not sure if it would be wise to risk it. What UML tool is it?
Thanks Jeanne Boyarsky!
I am using the IBM RSA.
Any one have any other point of view to share?
Thanks a lot.
|
 |
Devashish Bansal
Greenhorn
Joined: May 12, 2011
Posts: 29
|
|
|
I am also using IBM RSA and i know a friend who used this tool with icons in his assignment and passed, so i think there is no issue in using this tool, RSA (earlier Rational Rose) being the most famous UML tool since inception, also RSA is UML 2.1 compliant.
|
SCJP, SCWCD, SCEA Part1
|
 |
Joao Bosco Jares
Ranch Hand
Joined: May 13, 2011
Posts: 40
|
|
Devashish Bansal wrote:I am also using IBM RSA and i know a friend who used this tool with icons in his assignment and passed, so i think there is no issue in using this tool, RSA (earlier Rational Rose) being the most famous UML tool since inception, also RSA is UML 2.1 compliant.
Thanks a lot.
|
 |
Sharma Ashutosh
Bartender
Joined: Apr 06, 2001
Posts: 345
|
|
|
I think it's okay to have +, - and # as visibility icons...most importantly the tool should spit out the static images and not dynamic images...
|
Ashutosh Sharma
SCJP 1.2, SCEA 5, Brainbench certified J2EE Developer, Documentum Certified Professional
Blog : http://scea5-passingpart2and3.blogspot.com/
|
 |
Devashish Bansal
Greenhorn
Joined: May 12, 2011
Posts: 29
|
|
Actually, in RSA you can change visibility icons to +,-,#. In class diagram, select the box you want to change, go to menu Diagram->Filters->Stereotype and visibility style| and select Visibility style:Text.
But i found a more stubborn issue in RSA, in sequence diagrams it always shows text on every msg as 1.1.1 <text> and i cannot find how to hide this sequence number, and this is forcing me to move to other UML tools having wasted lot of time creating class diagram in RSA , if anyone happens to know solution to this, please do reply.
-Dev
|
 |
Sirish Somanchi
Greenhorn
Joined: Jul 12, 2011
Posts: 2
|
|
You can remove the number (1.1.1) before the msg in sequence diagrams by selecting "No numbers" option of "Message numbering on Sequence Diagrams" in Window->Preferences->Modeling->UML Diagrams->Sequence and Communication. (I am using RSA 8.0.2)
-Sirish
|
 |
Devashish Bansal
Greenhorn
Joined: May 12, 2011
Posts: 29
|
|
AHA...So they improved this in new version as I am using 7.0 and there is no such option in menu. Will download 8.0.3 now and get some relief, i don't understand how RSA (earlier versions) was such a famous tool if the sequence diagram shows "mandatory" numbers which make it look highly unprofessional.
Many Thanks for the info.
|
 |
Sirish Somanchi
Greenhorn
Joined: Jul 12, 2011
Posts: 2
|
|
Apparently the option was available from v7.0.0.1 onwards (http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=181742)
-Sirish
|
 |
 |
|
|
subject: Visibility attributes in UML diagrams
|
|
|