class diagram questions

[Victor Bucutea]

Hi everybody,


I've working for some time on the SCEA part II and I was wondering how you guys solved some aspects:

Did you represent the Local interface in the class diagram?

One of the sequence diagrams is getting extreeeemly large. It's becoming rather annoying to read. I'm sure this has happened to your design before and I'm wondering whether you have split it in multiple diagrams.

How did you represent for ex. a <<proprietary API>>. I've just provided an adapter interface, and represented it as a Stereotyped class... But I'm not sure about it. Should it be present only in the component diagram or only in the class diagram ?

Thanks
Victor

[Victor Bucutea]

Just a small correction,

# Did you represent the Local interface (of the EJB) in the class diagram?

It can be good because this way you have interfaces to show in your component diagram, but the class diagram is already becoming so bloated, I don't know how the examiner will cope with all the nice squares and lines...

If you can give me just some pointers...

Thanks,
Victor

[Victor Bucutea]

Guys, do you have any ideas/suggestions?


Thanks,
Victor

[Georgiana Lungu]

Victor Bucutea wrote:Just a small correction,

# Did you represent the Local interface (of the EJB) in the class diagram?

http://www.coderanch.com/t/542381/java-Architect-SCEA/certification/Failed-although-enough-points

[Jeanne Boyarsky]

1) I didn't include the local interface in the class diagram. Just the main EJB
2) Yes, splitting is fine.
3) I ended at the adapter in my sequence diagram because the rest isn't in my scope.