aspose file tools*
The moose likes EJB and other Java EE Technologies and the fly likes Do we need EJB3.1 or say EJB at all? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of Soft Skills this week in the Jobs Discussion forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » EJB and other Java EE Technologies
Bookmark "Do we need EJB3.1 or say EJB at all?" Watch "Do we need EJB3.1 or say EJB at all?" New topic
Author

Do we need EJB3.1 or say EJB at all?

Sujoy Choudhury
Ranch Hand

Joined: Sep 17, 2008
Posts: 136

Please don't hate me for this.

But now a days who uses EJB after Spring came into this market.
Why do we need EJB3.x at all?

What does it offer apart from Spring?



Thanks and Regards,
~Sujoy
Vijitha Kumara
Bartender

Joined: Mar 24, 2008
Posts: 3859

There have been many discussions about the same topic in last few years. Spring was introduced as a lightweight J2EE stack to overcome the complexities of earlier EJB versions. The EJB specification becoming lighter and lighter (That is much more developer friendly than it was before) nowadays. Spring may have played a key role in that. I think more the specification become developer friendly there's a chance that it may be used more in the future as the vendor support grows.


SCJP 5 | SCWCD 5
[How to ask questions] [Twitter]
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: Do we need EJB3.1 or say EJB at all?