The moose likes OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring and the fly likes Any GoF Patterns violate any OO Design Principles? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Engineering » OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring
Reply Bookmark "Any GoF Patterns violate any OO Design Principles? " Watch "Any GoF Patterns violate any OO Design Principles? " New topic
Author

Any GoF Patterns violate any OO Design Principles?

H Paul
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 26, 2011
Posts: 228
The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing. One cannot help but be in awe when he contemplates the mysteries of eternity, of life, of the marvelous structure of reality. It is enough if one tries merely to comprehend a little of this mystery every day. Never lose a holy curiosity.

Albert Einstein


Precisely, a curiosity. Just a question out of curiosity.

So if and only possible, can you let your valuable experience and/or observation speaks. 1M Thanks.

Quickly and scope-wise OO Design Principles mentioned/interested are:
SRP - Single Responsiblity Principle
OCP - Open Closed Principle
LSP - Liskov Substitution Principle
DIP - Dependency Inversion Principle
ISP - Interface Segration Principle

Does any GoF patterns violates any of the above mentioned?
 
 
subject: Any GoF Patterns violate any OO Design Principles?
 
Threads others viewed
Object Oriented Design Principles
Decoupling: Whats the reason?
Design Patterns
Alternative to GoF patterns?
why we need to declare the collection classes polymorphically
WebSphere development made easy
without the weight of IBM tools
http://www.myeclipseide.com

cast iron skillet 49er

more from paul wheaton's glorious empire of web junk: cast iron skillet diatomaceous earth rocket mass heater sepp holzer raised garden beds raising chickens lawn care CFL flea control missoula heat permaculture