Maneesh Godbole wrote:
Going by pure maths, this might be a bit difficult. I think the general rule of the thumb is 1.6 times the experience would be the salary.
Regardless of whether 1.6 is the correct multiplier, out of interest, what is the range where this rule of thumb applies?
For example, this wouldn't make sense on the low range, regardless of the multiplier, as that would imply someone with two years makes twice as much as someone with one year of experience.
Henry