Need some explanation on a configuration fix I made

[Jay Abrahm]

I have setup the Spring Flex test drive and have used that to setup a test project. I had to make the following changes to get the application to work. Can someone explain theoretically what I fixed to get the following two configurations to work.

Doesn't work

<flex:message-broker mapping-order="1">
  <flex:mapping pattern="/messagebroker/*"/>
  <flex:message-service
    default-channels="my-streaming-amf,my-longpolling-amf,my-polling-amf" />
  <flex:secured />
</flex:message-broker>
PageNotFound  W org.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet noHandlerFound 
No mapping found for HTTP request with URI 
[/TestProject/messagebroker/amf] in DispatcherServlet with name 'flex'

Works - Removed the flex:mapping pattern

<flex:message-broker mapping-order="1">
  <flex:message-service
    default-channels="my-streaming-amf,my-longpolling-amf,my-polling-amf" />
  <flex:secured />
</flex:message-broker>

2) I had fixed the call to the remote object from the default one in the test drive. I had to change the first remote call from "my-amf" to "amf" or had to remove the endpoint to get it to work. Why is that ?

// Fails
// MessageBroker E org.springframework.flex.servlet.MessageBrokerHandlerAdapter handle 
Received invalid request for endpoint path '/messagebroker/my-amf'.
<mx:RemoteObject id="productService" destination="productService"
	 endpoint="http://localhost:9084/HROnBoardingWeb/messagebroker/my-amf">
</mx:RemoteObject>
// Successful
<mx:RemoteObject id="industryService" destination="industryService">
</mx:RemoteObject>

Even though my-amf is defined in my services-config and the flex-servlet as

<services>
	<default-channels>
		<channel ref="my-amf"/>
	</default-channels>
</services>

<flex:remoting-destination ref="productService" />

@Service("industryService")
@RemotingDestination(channels = { "my-amf" })
public class IndustryDAO implements IIndustryDAO

[Ashwin Sridhar]

Have you declared messageBroker in your Deployment Descriptor as url pattern...? You might have missed on doing this