With Regards :-
Harmeet Singh
Mohamed Sanaulla | My Blog | Author of Java 9 Cookbook | Java 11 Cookbook
With Regards :-
Harmeet Singh
Jimmy kalra wrote:for the future , this is the good concept to implement ???
Jimmy kalra wrote:and why many java programmers does not like this ???
luck, db
There are no new questions, but there may be new answers.
Mohamed Sanaulla | My Blog | Author of Java 9 Cookbook | Java 11 Cookbook
With Regards :-
Harmeet Singh
With Regards :-
Harmeet Singh
Jimmy kalra wrote:javafx is act like flex with java?
Mohamed Sanaulla | My Blog | Author of Java 9 Cookbook | Java 11 Cookbook
Tim Moores wrote:None of whatever JavaFX 2 (or subsequent versions in the foreseeable future) adds will be able to change the fact that Java on the client (whether as standalone apps, JNLP or applets) is dead. Frankly, I don't get why the resources being used for JavaFX are not applied to improving Swing. Making client-side developers go through a transition doesn't help, either, IMO.
Mohamed Sanaulla | My Blog | Author of Java 9 Cookbook | Java 11 Cookbook
Tim Moores wrote:None of whatever JavaFX 2 (or subsequent versions in the foreseeable future) adds will be able to change the fact that Java on the client (whether as standalone apps, JNLP or applets) is dead. Frankly, I don't get why the resources being used for JavaFX are not applied to improving Swing. Making client-side developers go through a transition doesn't help, either, IMO.
Mohamed Sanaulla wrote:
Jimmy kalra wrote:javafx is act like flex with java?
Yes to some extent. But Flex doesn't provide for building standalone desktop applications. For Desktop they have Adobe AIR. But as far as I am aware, JavaFX should run in a browser or as a standalone on desktop.
I dont know how much JavaFX is different from Adobe technologies behind the scenes.
permaculture is giving a gift to your future self. After reading this tiny ad:
a bit of art, as a gift, that will fit in a stocking
https://gardener-gift.com
|