wood burning stoves
The moose likes Ant, Maven and Other Build Tools and the fly likes Best build automation tool-ANT/Maven Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Engineering » Ant, Maven and Other Build Tools
Bookmark "Best build automation tool-ANT/Maven" Watch "Best build automation tool-ANT/Maven" New topic

Best build automation tool-ANT/Maven

sathya kumar

Joined: Jul 19, 2011
Posts: 7
Hi all,

I just want to use build automation tool for my project.Finally I concluded to use either ANT or MAVEN.Corporate level which one is more popular?
Browsing shows equal percentage 50-50(Including pros and cons).Suggest any one of the tool.

Thanks in advance.
Peter Johnson

Joined: May 14, 2008
Posts: 5852

At my company, we are currently migrating all of our projects to be Maven-based, primarily because of the support for having a binary repository and automatic handling of dependencies.

JBoss In Action
Jeanne Boyarsky
author & internet detective

Joined: May 26, 2003
Posts: 33106

Ant is a build tool. Maven is a build and dependency management and ... tool. You could use Ivy to have Ant do more, but if you need what Maven provides, it is probably easier to use Maven.

Another big difference on a day to day basis is that in Ant you program what you want to do and in Maven you declare it.

[OCA 8 book] [Blog] [JavaRanch FAQ] [How To Ask Questions The Smart Way] [Book Promos]
Other Certs: SCEA Part 1, Part 2 & 3, Core Spring 3, TOGAF part 1 and part 2
Tim Holloway
Saloon Keeper

Joined: Jun 25, 2001
Posts: 17410

If you want to do really complex builds, Ant has the advantage in flexibility. In fact, Maven can invoke Ant.

However, for the most common build processes, such as executable JARs, WARs and EARS, Maven is all that's required in most cases.

Aside from the repository advantages (and I was getting REALLY tired of copying the same old library jars over and over into each new project and filling up my hard drive to boot), the other principal advantage of Maven is that it enforces a standard project layout and build environment.

The major barrier to code reuse in the last big IT shop I worked in was that the other primary Java developing group had a completely different - and somewhat conflicting - build setup and toolkit. They had a homebrew ORM that came from a third group in an office which had been shut down, all the workers laid off or refused to relocate, leaving only one person to support it. Except that he had new duties and didn't have time to. And, worst of all, the other group's code couldn't actually be built stand-alone. You had to have your desktop, IDE, and filesystem virtually cloned from them to do builds.

This was back before any of us had learned to appreciate Maven.

An IDE is no substitute for an Intelligent Developer.
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
subject: Best build automation tool-ANT/Maven
It's not a secret anymore!