This week's giveaway is in the EJB and other Java EE Technologies forum.
We're giving away four copies of EJB 3 in Action and have Debu Panda, Reza Rahman, Ryan Cuprak, and Michael Remijan on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes Servlets and the fly likes Session Counter Locking Question Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of EJB 3 in Action this week in the EJB and other Java EE Technologies forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » Servlets
Bookmark "Session Counter Locking Question" Watch "Session Counter Locking Question" New topic
Author

Session Counter Locking Question

A Phatak
Greenhorn

Joined: Sep 22, 2011
Posts: 24
I keep having some trouble understanding synchronizing concept in the context of static vs nonstatic. For e.g. take a look at the code below:


It is a simple listener that counts number of active sessions. However, we know HttpSession object is not thread safe. So I believe that "counter" variable should be incremented in a "synchronized" manner.

It is clear that getCounter() should change to public synchronized static int getSessionCounter()

My question is what changes should be implemented in sessionDestroyed() and sessionCreated() methods? Which of the following is correct?



OR




Or does it have to be synchronized at all?

ocpjp 6 (86%)
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: Session Counter Locking Question
 
Similar Threads
Synchronizing Session Counter
HttpSessionListener : Where can i see this output ?
how would the sessionListener object be accessed
Updating a JSP session attribute and html code on mouse click
doubt with the answer