• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

assertion error when unittesting persisting objects

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 47
Netbeans IDE Eclipse IDE Debian
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I need help understanding why my test is failing.

I'm trying to unittest a persist method for persisting a user. The involwed classes are :

PersistenceManager (singleton for sharing a entitymanagerfactory app wide)

UserControler ( subclass of jpa entity User )

UserActions (junit testclass)

The problem I have is that when I get a entitymanager in the unittest and ask if it contain the just persisted user it returns false.

See below relevant code:

 
Ben Ooms
Ranch Hand
Posts: 47
Netbeans IDE Eclipse IDE Debian
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Well,

I resolved the issue, my unittest is passing when i use the find instead of contains.



So that give us a new question:

Given the following scenario:
- jpa persistence with hibernate and H2 transactions configured "resource_local"
- Class A sharing a entityManagerFactory
- Class B getting a entityManager with class A factory and persisting an object Foo

if in a class C we get a entityManager with class A factory and query for Foo:
- contains return false
- find returns object foo as expected.

Can somebody explain what i'm missing to understand here?


reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic