| Author |
Cade/Shiel part 2 worked example -bid object multiplicity confusion
|
chris J Smith
Greenhorn
Joined: Dec 29, 2011
Posts: 8
|
|
Hi Ranchers,
I'm a newbie so go easy.
I've been looking through the part 2 worked example in the Cade book and I'm unsure as to why the multiplicity of the Bid - Bidder association is different in the domain model on page 169 and the class diagram on page 172. In the domain model the relationship is that a bid can have one bidder but a bidder can have 0 to many bids whereas in the class diagram a Bid class is associated with 0 to many Bidder classes and the multiplicity from Bidder to Bid has gone. Is this a definite change or just a printing error? I thought it was a no no to change the given domain model like this? To me the relationship in the domain model makes sense so the change is confusing.
I'd be interested to know your thoughts.
Chris
|
 |
kumar naresh
Ranch Hand
Joined: Mar 12, 2011
Posts: 108
|
|
Hi Smith,
I think its a print mistake, relationship has to follow Bid 0..n ---- 1 Bidder same thing, in the image 0..n and 1 got closer and 1 got mixed in the line.
Kumar.
|
OCMJEA 5 |
http://sceacertification.blogspot.in/2011_12_01_archive.html
|
 |
 |
|
|
subject: Cade/Shiel part 2 worked example -bid object multiplicity confusion
|
|
|