| Author |
Component diagram - depicting dependency
|
Shruti Verma
Greenhorn
Joined: Dec 18, 2011
Posts: 7
|
|
I have a very simple question about depicting dependency between components and between layers in component diagram -
Using bubble and socket
OR
using <<uses>> stereotype with a dependency association (Cade's way)?
|
 |
Sadanandam Kurapati
Ranch Hand
Joined: Sep 09, 2011
Posts: 77
|
|
For dependency between components, I used Cade's way <<uses>>.
Regards,
Sadanand
|
SCJP1.5, SCWCD5, SCEA5
|
 |
Shashi Kulkarni
Greenhorn
Joined: May 29, 2011
Posts: 25
|
|
|
I second Sadanand here. I also followed the Cade's way and used <<uses>> for showing the dependency between components.
|
SCJP, OCMJEA, PMP, Brainbench certified OO Concepts, Brainbench certified OO Design Patterns, Brainbench certified EJB 3
http://shashikantkulkarni.com/
|
 |
Vijaykumar Dixit
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jul 04, 2011
Posts: 32
|
|
Wherever possible component dependency should be shown by required and provided interfaces i.e. sockect and bubble notation. That makes a component isolated, replaceable and independent. I think <<uses>> notation is just a work around when we do not have clarity on specific interfaces within a component.
Just my opinion.
|
 |
 |
|
|
subject: Component diagram - depicting dependency
|
|
|