Win a copy of Re-engineering Legacy Software this week in the Refactoring forum
or Docker in Action in the Agile forum!
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

wikipedia and reddit protesting web bills on wednesday

 
Jeanne Boyarsky
author & internet detective
Marshal
Posts: 34084
337
Eclipse IDE Java VI Editor
  • Likes 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Wikipedia to Go Dark on Wednesday to Protest Bills on Web Piracy
The wave of online protests against two Congressional bills that aim to curtail copyright violations on the Internet is gathering momentum.

Wikipedia is the latest Web site to decide to shut on Wednesday in protest against the two Congressional bills, the Stop Online Piracy Act, often called SOPA, and the Protect IP Act, which is often called PIPA.
...

Reddit is also participating. In lieu of the website, American visitors will see information about the bill.
 
John Jai
Rancher
Posts: 1776
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Bill says to curtail copyright violation. Wikipedia is built on such violations?
 
Jesper de Jong
Java Cowboy
Saloon Keeper
Posts: 15207
36
Android IntelliJ IDE Java Scala Spring
  • Likes 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
No, Wikipedia isn't built on copyright violations. But the SOPA and PIPA law proposals are going much further than to just protect copyright. Many big companies are protesting against these proposed laws. I don't know the details but as far as I know these laws propose to put heavy censorship on the whole web, where any company who doesn't like what someone writes can have the website shutdown, or even websites that link to the website.

See: Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA)
 
fred rosenberger
lowercase baba
Bartender
Posts: 12085
29
Chrome Java Linux
  • Likes 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
One person said that SOPA and PIPA would be like banning all automobiles because they are occasionally used in bank robberies.
 
fred rosenberger
lowercase baba
Bartender
Posts: 12085
29
Chrome Java Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Google tell you how to make your site go dark and not affect your page rank here.
 
Jeanne Boyarsky
author & internet detective
Marshal
Posts: 34084
337
Eclipse IDE Java VI Editor
 
Jeanne Boyarsky
author & internet detective
Marshal
Posts: 34084
337
Eclipse IDE Java VI Editor
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
John Jai wrote:Bill says to curtail copyright violation. Wikipedia is built on such violations?

Let's say some fool posts an pirated whatever on wikipedia. Before wikipedia takes it down someone says "wikipedia hosts pirated content; let's delist them". Shouldn't wikipedia get the opportunity to fix it before facing a large/fatal penalty? These feels like another case of big media trying to have a solution that is so much worse than the problem.
 
Jeanne Boyarsky
author & internet detective
Marshal
Posts: 34084
337
Eclipse IDE Java VI Editor
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Reddit has a good description of the problem with the bill. They also have a countdown clock to their 12 hour blackout (starting in about 9 hours.)
 
Akhilesh Trivedi
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1599
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Jeanne Boyarsky wrote:...Let's say some fool posts an pirated whatever on wikipedia. Before wikipedia takes it down someone says "wikipedia hosts pirated content; let's delist them". Shouldn't wikipedia get the opportunity to fix it before facing a large/fatal penalty? .


When I read this thread first, I could actually not figure out what it was actually about. But I think whenever it comes to laws or acts, they need to be carefully framed, because they are often often 'read between the lines' or I must say even between the individual words. Back to wikipedia, and sites whose content is mainly driven not by themselves but by its users, be it a blog, are very tricky to handle in terms of copyrights. "Who should be blamed for the copyright post?" the host or the poster? Jeanne, I can not think that wikipedia can be excused or be given a temporary time-line to 'fix' a pirated content (especially when you are in process of framing/enforcing a law or act ). Because this might lead to a strange scenario where in say, a much awaited new movie in the town can be put on the internet(again say not by the host but by the poster), and be distributed/downloaded and say after the 'time-line' be taken or 'fixed' off! !! The copyright-violation-business is done and it is all done well within the 'time-line' of the law!
 
Maneesh Godbole
Saloon Keeper
Posts: 11021
12
Android Eclipse IDE Google Web Toolkit Java Mac Ubuntu
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I like the way, how google has voiced their opinion

source
The image has a tool tip which says,"Tell Congress: Please don't censor the web!"
 
John Jai
Rancher
Posts: 1776
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Maneesh - which link did you hit to get that blocked image on google? Are they using that in the main search page?
 
Jesper de Jong
Java Cowboy
Saloon Keeper
Posts: 15207
36
Android IntelliJ IDE Java Scala Spring
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Wikipedia has a page that explains what it means and why they're protesting.

By the way, also for JavaRanch these bills would be very harmful. It sometimes happens that people (knowingly or unknowingly) post illegally copied material, or links to illegally copied material, in a forum post. The moderators usually take care of removing those things, but imagine that JavaRanch would be blacklisted because of this!
 
John Jai
Rancher
Posts: 1776
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
We can add another rule besides "Be Nice" stating no posting of copyright violations and it's like parking at owner's risk. Javaranch cannot be held because of violated postings and the individual is. Will that suffice?
 
Akhilesh Trivedi
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1599
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
John Jai wrote:We can add another rule besides "Be Nice" stating no posting of copyright violations and it's like parking at owner's risk. Javaranch cannot be held because of violated postings and the individual is. Will that suffice?


That may suffice, but how do you convince 'law-people' or the guy whose content is copied here. Its not about parking at owner's risk. It is about whose vehicle is parked and how to deal with it.?? And it is more vigorous, a vehicle has an owner but 'literature/art' have a copyright owner, while you can not ctrl-c ctrl-v a vehicle it is as easy for later case.
 
John Jai
Rancher
Posts: 1776
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
You are right.. may be some other alternative way Wikipedia and other organizations might suggest the US government. But it's not listed here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Learn_more
 
Jesper de Jong
Java Cowboy
Saloon Keeper
Posts: 15207
36
Android IntelliJ IDE Java Scala Spring
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
John Jai wrote:We can add another rule besides "Be Nice" stating no posting of copyright violations and it's like parking at owner's risk. Javaranch cannot be held because of violated postings and the individual is. Will that suffice?

If these new laws would be in effect then no, such a rule would not suffice. These laws would mean that anybody who complains about illegal material on JavaRanch, or even only a link to illegal material, could have JavaRanch be taken off the web. Doesn't matter if JavaRanch told its users that it's not allowed.
 
fred rosenberger
lowercase baba
Bartender
Posts: 12085
29
Chrome Java Linux
  • Likes 5
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
To further muddy the waters...if a company complains that JavaRanch is hosting pirated material, according to the law, they don't even have to tell us they are taking us down. There does not seem to be any remedy to get us back online. There is no independant, 3rd party (such a a court) to decide such things, or to hear an appeal (at least as far as I've read).

Basically, the DNS is NOT ALLOWED to tell anyone how to get to JavaRanch. This is a fundamental breach of the 1st amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It may be illegal for me to BUILD a bomb, but it is NOT illegal for me to tell you how to build it - that is protected as free speech.
 
John Jai
Rancher
Posts: 1776
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
So you guys in US feel that this law will be passed at sometime? What's the alternative that's being proposed to the law makers? Why suddenly this bill got momentum? Is there any election coming near by?
 
Hussein Baghdadi
clojure forum advocate
Bartender
Posts: 3479
Clojure Mac Objective C
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
What Non-US citizens can do to join the campaign?
 
Mary Chellapa
Ranch Hand
Posts: 93
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Great even firefox made its whole page black!
 
Randall Twede
Ranch Hand
Posts: 4363
2
Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
this isn't the first time our esteemed government has tried this stuff
 
Jeanne Boyarsky
author & internet detective
Marshal
Posts: 34084
337
Eclipse IDE Java VI Editor
  • Likes 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The alternative is to not pass it. Or fix it.

And with the car analogy - I complain ypu are parked illegally. Your car is towed but we don't tell you where it has been taken or how to get it back.
 
Christian Peacock
Greenhorn
Posts: 26
  • Likes 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
To hold the web site owner responsible for illegal content posted by others is just ridiculous. It's like prosecuting someone for holding stolen goods that have been dumped on their property by a passing thief.
Like everything else, the web is being turned from something of pleasure for many into a commercial tool for the few.
 
Pat Farrell
Rancher
Posts: 4678
7
Linux Mac OS X VI Editor
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Christian Peacock wrote:To hold the web site owner responsible for illegal content posted by others is just ridiculous. It's like prosecuting someone for holding stolen goods that have been dumped on their property by a passing thief. Like everything else, the web is being turned from something of pleasure for many into a commercial tool for the few.


Its far worse that this. The bill says that anyone claiming that their copyright has been violated can cause the "bad site" DNS to be broken. Breaking DNS is not something that any technical person accepts -- managing DNS properly is hard enough already.

I write software for a living, there is very little difference between the bits I write and the bits in an album or in a movie. I want to get paid, I expect that others do too. So there is a real problem. But SOPA and PIPA are not real solutions. They are stupid, evil, arbitrary, and infeasible.
 
Pat Farrell
Rancher
Posts: 4678
7
Linux Mac OS X VI Editor
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I have no idea why Google pushed for an on-line petition. Congresscritters do not care about them.

The only thing that congresscritters care about are voters in their district. You have one Congressman/woman, and two Senators. Those are the only folks you can impact, unless you give money to the EFF, ACLU, EPIC, etc. When you talk to them, you have to give your name and your address, so they can verify that you vote in a place that matters to them.

I live "inside the Beltway" so calling Capitol Hill is a local call for me. I called the Capitol switchboard three times yesterday to tell each of my three congresscritters what I thought. It took only a minute or two per office. It took a couple of tried, the switchboard was overloaded.
 
Bear Bibeault
Author and ninkuma
Marshal
Pie
Posts: 64623
86
IntelliJ IDE Java jQuery Mac Mac OS X
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Apparently, yesterday's protests did some good.

Today, even John Cornyn is talking some sense. Now when John Cornyn talks sense, something extraordinary has happened.
 
Akhilesh Trivedi
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1599
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
So the D-Day is Jan 24?
 
Henry Wong
author
Marshal
Pie
Posts: 20889
75
C++ Chrome Eclipse IDE Firefox Browser Java jQuery Linux VI Editor Windows
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Bear Bibeault wrote:Apparently, yesterday's protests did some good.

Today, even John Cornyn is talking some sense. Now when John Cornyn talks sense, something extraordinary has happened.



Yeah. Kinda feel sorry for congress. Having to choose between losing millions of dollars from lobbyists or supporting their constituents...

Henry
 
Pat Farrell
Rancher
Posts: 4678
7
Linux Mac OS X VI Editor
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Henry Wong wrote:Yeah. Kinda feel sorry for congress. Having to choose between losing millions of dollars from lobbyists or supporting their constituents.


Usually, they pick the lobbyists and money. A friend of mine was the Director of Communications for the US House a few years back. He was in charge of telephones, networking, etc. He offered to upgrade their systems to a modern email system so that the Congressman/woman could get in better communications with their constituents. He was told in no uncertain terms: the congressmen do not want to have better communications with the constituents.

This battle is not close to being over. SOPA lives and may polymorph into more laws in the future.
 
Randall Twede
Ranch Hand
Posts: 4363
2
Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
i didn't read all the replies to this but i will say this. this is not the first time they have tried to pass overreaching laws like this in the name of protecting copyrights. they were doing it when i was in school the last time around 2003 or so.
 
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic