A project began like the Blueprint for the ConceptBase, which have Neugenery in the core, the fact is we're not in the JCBC
(Java ConceptBase Connectivity) section yet, and question is, would the forum expect JCBC remain like the same policy as JDBC or not?
In addition to that question, I should admit that the JCBC have one eye on JDBC, too, that's not to say a special version to be for JDBC, due to the different wayward. i.e. this is 'exactly' to say how the Zipf Law is under consideration by the end of this project, because the Zipf Law is quite 'word' base, whereas with the Neugenery's vision is quite 'conceptually'.
Because we're expecting most likely a deterministic query from CB (ConceptBase).
Deterministic according to the relativity in which ConceptBase make, and un-deterministic because for example, it occur that there ain't
not experienced such query.
Yes, you are right, that's I presume I was too forward in that question before preparation.
The whole matter is quite new technology and in the state of art, nevertheless, the interface is mostly the same.
The product to be in use, like any Databases¹, the application should handle query via Drivers (like Databases), but instead of 'Database(s)' (Oracle, SQL, MySQL, ...) we have 'ConceptBase', now, the question is like the following:
This query is quite flexible like any illiterate would like to make with his/her peers/counterparts and jot down as query,
now, the first part (OOA) are about to forward them via the Driver, using JCBC to (Concept Oriented Architecture COA),
I'd like to know forum' idea about the Driver and JCBC, about how this policy should be in progress, nevertheless what the ConceptBase is?
¹ ConceptBase in the Artificial Intelligence, and in Cognitive Applications, whereas the DataBases in E-Commerce, and any routine applications (100%).