jQuery in Action, 3rd edition
The moose likes Beginning Java and the fly likes Problem with stack class Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login

Win a copy of Make it so: Java DB Connections & Transactions this week in the JDBC forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » Beginning Java
Bookmark "Problem with stack class" Watch "Problem with stack class" New topic

Problem with stack class

sovan chatt
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 09, 2010
Posts: 43
removeElementAt() method is available in vector class so,its also available to stack class ..but using this method any element can be eliminated..which cannot be a proper implementation of stack... or is it?
Matthew Brown

Joined: Apr 06, 2010
Posts: 4541

No, it's not ideal. Those are classes from the original version of Java, and if they were added now I suspect they'd be designed differently - I'd expect to see Stack as an interface, with some class (possibly one of the existing collections) implementing it. A bit like the way LinkedList implements the Queue interface nowadays.
Muhammad Khojaye
Ranch Hand

Joined: Apr 12, 2009
Posts: 449

Agreed. This is one example of incorrect inheritance. A stack is not a vector, so Stack should not extend Vector. Similarly, a property list is not a hash table, so Properties should not extend Hashtable. In both cases, composition would have been preferable. There is one item also listed in Effective Java related to this.

Campbell Ritchie

Joined: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 45410
You ought to use this instead of Stack.
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
subject: Problem with stack class
It's not a secret anymore!