aspose file tools*
The moose likes Beginning Java and the fly likes Define a partial order interface help Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » Beginning Java
Bookmark "Define a partial order interface help" Watch "Define a partial order interface help" New topic
Author

Define a partial order interface help

Craig Warnick
Greenhorn

Joined: Feb 24, 2012
Posts: 8
I need some help understanding what a partial order interface with one method greaterThan(). I am working on an exercise to compare the volume of three boxes and this statement is the next step. Thank you,
Rob Spoor
Sheriff

Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Posts: 19693
    
  20

Why not use Comparable? You can use compareTo for the same causes. For a.compareTo(b)
  • < 0 means that a is less than b
  • > 0 means that a is greater than b
  • == 0 means that a is equal to b

  • You can also use <= and >= of course.


    SCJP 1.4 - SCJP 6 - SCWCD 5 - OCEEJBD 6
    How To Ask Questions How To Answer Questions
    Jeff Verdegan
    Bartender

    Joined: Jan 03, 2004
    Posts: 6109
        
        6

    Craig Warnick wrote:I need some help understanding what a partial order interface with one method greaterThan().


    Can you provide some context? Where did you come across this term? And what specific problems are you having?
    Paul Clapham
    Bartender

    Joined: Oct 14, 2005
    Posts: 18570
        
        8

    Well, here's a link to the Wikipedia article about it: Partially ordered set. I must say, I don't really see how to implement a partial ordering over a domain in Java; perhaps you throw a runtime exception if you try to compare a pair of incomparable elements?

    But anyway if you're just going to compare the volume of boxes, then that's really a Total order. In that case it's much easier to implement a greaterThan method.
    Craig Warnick
    Greenhorn

    Joined: Feb 24, 2012
    Posts: 8
    class BoxVolSort implements Comparator<Box> {
    public int compare(Box b1, Box b2, Box b3) {
    if(b1.getVolume() == b2.getVolume()==b3.get volume)
    return 0;
    else if (b1.getVolume() < b2.getVolume() > b3.getVolume)
    return -1;
    else
    return 1;

    This is what I came up with off the top of my head, but the statement that caused my helmet fire is:

    box b > box c returns 1 whenever box c fits inside box box b. Note that c fits inside b if there is a way to arrange the dimensions of each box so
    the corresponding dimensions of b are each larger than c.

    No clue how to do that. Thanks for your earlier reply Saloon Keeper.

    Craig Warnick
    Greenhorn

    Joined: Feb 24, 2012
    Posts: 8
    Its just a programming exercise I was given from a coworker. to help me learn Java. I am not in the programming business but trying to learn. Thanks
    Winston Gutkowski
    Bartender

    Joined: Mar 17, 2011
    Posts: 7784
        
      21

    Craig Warnick wrote:box b > box c returns 1 whenever box c fits inside box box b. Note that c fits inside b if there is a way to arrange the dimensions of each box so
    the corresponding dimensions of b are each larger than c.

    No clue how to do that. Thanks for your earlier reply Saloon Keeper.

    Well, first off, java.util.Comparator works on two objects, not three, so I'd start off by amending your class accordingly.

    Second, as you said yourself:
    Note that c fits inside b if there is a way to arrange the dimensions of each box so the corresponding dimensions of b are each larger than c.
    So, in terms of a "fits inside" order, I would say that if Box a fits inside Box b, then
    compare(a, b)
    should return a negative number, and
    compare(b, a)
    should return a positive one; otherwise, your comparator should return 0 because the two objects have no 'order' with respect to each other in terms of "fitting in".

    Then it's just a matter of calling the method for combinations of pairs for larger numbers of boxes.

    [Edit] Note that while the above would work for providing a rudimentary "fits in" ordering, I suspect there's quite a bit more logic required to actually create a POS for these boxes. In terms of structure, I think I might look at an array of linked lists, but I suspect you're also going to need to come up with a heuristic to ensure that as many boxes are "fitted" as possible.

    HIH

    Winston


    Isn't it funny how there's always time and money enough to do it WRONG?
    Articles by Winston can be found here
    Jesper de Jong
    Java Cowboy
    Saloon Keeper

    Joined: Aug 16, 2005
    Posts: 14149
        
      18

    Craig Warnick wrote:I need some help understanding what a partial order interface with one method greaterThan(). I am working on an exercise to compare the volume of three boxes and this statement is the next step. Thank you,

    It sounds like the exercise is to define an interface with one method, greaterThan(). You can do that in just 3 lines of code or so.

    See What Is an Interface? in Oracle's Java Tutorials.


    Java Beginners FAQ - JavaRanch SCJP FAQ - The Java Tutorial - Java SE 7 API documentation
    Scala Notes - My blog about Scala
    Craig Warnick
    Greenhorn

    Joined: Feb 24, 2012
    Posts: 8
    Thanks for all your responses and help. Got it figured out.
    Campbell Ritchie
    Sheriff

    Joined: Oct 13, 2005
    Posts: 38818
        
      23
    Well done, and welcome to the Ranch
     
    I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
     
    subject: Define a partial order interface help