apache commons file upload version

hi all,

i am trying to help on fixing the problems of the jforum in postgresql database. Here is the libraries that i have
1. apache commons file upload verion 1.0 commons-fileupload-1.0.jar
2. Jboss cache
3. htmlparser
4. jcaptcha-all-1.0-RC2.0.1.jar

However, when i try to compile the jforum from source, it prompts
package org.apache.commons.fileupload.disk does not exist

am i using the wrong version of the fileupload ?

Regards,
Sam Leong
[originally posted on jforum.net by samleong]

Which problems with postgresql?

The right version of commons-upload to use is the one which comes with JForum.

Rafael
[originally posted on jforum.net by Rafael Steil]

yeah ths i have found that version and able to compile it already.

I have sort of fixed that problem. It is abt message approval problem. Seems in postgresSql it cannot show the pending messages. And i have made some changes to the

/postgresql/ModerationModel.java

I have changed the line from
return super.topicsByForum(forumId, count, start + count);

into
return super.topicsByForum(forumId, count, start);

as in postgresql, select * ... limit count , offset start + count will return null if the actual number of rows in the result space is less than the start + count.

/Regards,
Sam

[originally posted on jforum.net by samleong]

JForum 2.1.4 has this bug fixed. If you are running 2.1.3 and would like to upgrade, download the patch: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/jforum/patch-2.1.3-to-2.1.4.zip?download

Rafael
[originally posted on jforum.net by Rafael Steil]

It is under WEB-INF/lib

Rafael
[originally posted on jforum.net by Rafael Steil]

Where can I find the file upload version that comes with JForum?

I need this because I make a web apps that loads files up but it gives problems when I uses this together with JForum.

Thanx,

Henk
[originally posted on jforum.net by henkie]

This is because jforum uses an experimental 1.1 version of fileupload which deprecates all the methods in the stable 1.0 version.

I don't know why rafael went out of his way to get the 1.1 version instead of the stable one. I think for the use he gives to it 1.0 would be enough (i havent studied the differences)
[originally posted on jforum.net by Anonymous]