wood burning stoves*
The moose likes Java in General and the fly likes Is a standalone abstract class of any use ? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » Java in General
Bookmark "Is a standalone abstract class of any use ?" Watch "Is a standalone abstract class of any use ?" New topic
Author

Is a standalone abstract class of any use ?

Jayati Das
Greenhorn

Joined: Feb 01, 2007
Posts: 18
I was asked this in an interview recently , If an abstract class is not going to be extended ,does declaring a class abstract serve any purpose ?
I couldnt think of any use of a standalone abstract class.




SCJP5 85%
Ralph Cook
Ranch Hand

Joined: May 29, 2005
Posts: 479
I suppose you could still call static methods on such a class, but I'd hardly call that a reason for having an abstract class that isn't extended. Sounds like one of those nice 'trivia' 'gotcha' questions some interviewers like.
Jayati Das
Greenhorn

Joined: Feb 01, 2007
Posts: 18
Thank you for replying.
Winston Gutkowski
Bartender

Joined: Mar 17, 2011
Posts: 7064
    
  16

Jayati Das wrote:If an abstract class is not going to be extended ,does declaring a class abstract serve any purpose?

I think my answer would be 'no', because the whole point of an abstract class is to be extended, so the idea of a 'standalone' abstract class is a bit of an oxymoron.

The only example that I can think of would be a constants-only interface, and those have generally been discredited.

However, I totally agree with Ralph: I think it's one of those 'gotcha' questions; and not very well worded at that.

Winston


Isn't it funny how there's always time and money enough to do it WRONG?
Artlicles by Winston can be found here
Matthew Brown
Bartender

Joined: Apr 06, 2010
Posts: 4240
    
    7

I suspect they're thinking of a Utility - i.e. a class that only has static methods. For example, java.lang.Math.
Campbell Ritchie
Sheriff

Joined: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 36514
    
  16
Utility classes are not usualloy abstract. They are usually unintantiable.
Matthew Brown
Bartender

Joined: Apr 06, 2010
Posts: 4240
    
    7

Campbell Ritchie wrote:Utility classes are not usualloy abstract. They are usually unintantiable.

I know. I still reckon that's probably what they were getting at, though .

Or, having thought a bit more about it, maybe they were looking for the answer "no - if you want an uninstantiable class you should do it a different way" (i.e. the way mentioned in that link).
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: Is a standalone abstract class of any use ?
 
Similar Threads
abstract class
abstract class
abstract class
Regarding abstract class
Use of constructor in abstract class?