| Author |
Possible to run an EJB3 timer without transaction?
|
Steve Sinai
Greenhorn
Joined: Aug 21, 2004
Posts: 25
|
|
Is there a way to run an EJB3 timer without it being inside a transaction?
Sometimes the methods run by the timer throw exceptions, and I'd like to be able to update a database with a failed flag if that happens. But the EJBTransactionRolledbackException that gets thrown prevents me from doing this.
Thanks.
|
 |
Meiyappan Kannappa
Greenhorn
Joined: Sep 15, 2008
Posts: 10
|
|
|
I hope you can disable the transaction by setting the transaction attribute to Never or Not supported . But I havent tried of this scenario.
|
Warm Regards
|
 |
Steve Sinai
Greenhorn
Joined: Aug 21, 2004
Posts: 25
|
|
I was able to solve the problem by not throwing Timer exceptions up to a common exception handling method. Instead I caught them and dealt with them in the method in which they were caught.
It was turning out that if I threw an exception up the method chain, EJB would automatically embed it in some kind of transaction exception, which meant I couldn't write something to the database notifying people that an exception had occurred. If I didn't throw the exception, then there was no transaction exception involved.
|
 |
William P O'Sullivan
Ranch Hand
Joined: Mar 28, 2012
Posts: 860
|
|
Thanks for sharing Steve, interesting...
WP
|
 |
 |
|
|
subject: Possible to run an EJB3 timer without transaction?
|
|
|