This week's book giveaway is in the OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring forum. We're giving away four copies of Refactoring for Software Design Smells: Managing Technical Debt and have Girish Suryanarayana, Ganesh Samarthyam & Tushar Sharma on-line! See this thread for details.
The rules about overloading are not easy to understand; look at the §15.12 link in that page I quoted. As an over‑simplification, if there are two alternatives, the compiler chooses the “more specific” parameter type. So String takes precedence over Object because it as a sub-class and therefore more specific.
Campbell Ritchie wrote:The rules about overloading are not easy to understand; look at the §15.12 link in that page I quoted. As an over‑simplification, if there are two alternatives, the compiler chooses the “more specific” parameter type. So String takes precedence over Object because it as a sub-class and therefore more specific.
That is correct , first complier or jvm (not sure) chooses method that has more speific parameter as argument if it doesn't matches than it chooses next alternativei.e next paramenter in which argumanet can be fit
Joined: Oct 13, 2005
Overloading: version chosen by compiler at compile time.
Overriding: version chosen by JVM at run-time.
pramod talekar wrote:This question was asked in an interview and the interviewer said that the compiler will throw an error due to ambiguity.
The ambiguity will come only when you call the method with a null literal.
Please note that it has to be the literal. Even passing a null String reference will enable compiler to select the right method (and hence it will not report any problem).
Lastly, sorry for being too finicky (programmer's brain's OCD), but "compiler will throw an error" does not make sense at all. Compiler can only report compilation problems. It can not throw any Error or Exception.
When you invoke an overloaded method, the compiler tries to find which of these methods is "closer" (or more specific, as Campbell already mentioned) to the arguments that you are passing. So when you are passing null as argument, the compiler is thinking: "Hmmmm, he gave me a null argument and I have a method that accepts a String and an Object. String is more specific that Object, so I will invoke the method that accepts String as an argument."
For instance, try to execute the following program:
The output will be:
Result 1) comes from the invocation of the aa(String s) and 3) from the aa(Object o). The compiler tried to find the most specific method related to the arguments. The same applies to result 2) where we have an Intreger as an argument. The most specific method that can be found is aa(Object o) -- remember that an Integer is not a String but it is an Object --. As an exercise, try to experiment with different methods and arguments. For example, can you find what will be printed when we execute the following program? (try to guess before you run it and see the actual results)
I’ve looked at a lot of different solutions, and in my humble opinion Aspose is the way to go. Here’s the link: http://aspose.com