Roel De Nijs wrote:I know I can solve this issue by adding the possessive quantifier to the * in the regex ("\\d+(,\\d+)*+"). But the 3 different quantifiers (greedy, reluctant and possessive) are a bit of a black box to me, so I have no clue why possessive quantifier solves the issue (and greedy or reluctant don't).
"Leadership is nature's way of removing morons from the productive flow" - Dogbert
Articles by Winston can be found here
Roel De Nijs wrote:But i have no clue why the possessive qualifier short-circuit this one (and what's the difference with the greedy one)...
"Leadership is nature's way of removing morons from the productive flow" - Dogbert
Articles by Winston can be found here