This week's book giveaway is in the Agile and other Processes forum. We're giving away four copies of The Mikado Method and have Ola Ellnestam and Daniel Brolund on-line! See this thread for details.
Rob Spoor wrote:You are of course very right. Lossy, not lossless. If it were lossless it would be no problem at all to decompress it.
Actually, there are quite a lot of utilities around that can convert a JPEG image to a bitmap. Wouldn't that be considered decompressing?
I also have no idea whether the same capabilities exist in Java.
@Vinod: If you do that, you'll get whatever quality the JPEG was saved with. And it'll take up a LOT more space; so, unless you think you need it, I wouldn't bother.
Winston
Isn't it funny how there's always time and money enough to do it WRONG?
Ulf Dittmer
Marshal
Joined: Mar 22, 2005
Posts: 35241
7
posted
0
These days, I wouldn't use JAI for anything. I think there's a plugin for javax.imageio.ImageIO that allows it to use Jpeg2000.
i am doing some Iris Biometric study with biometric service providers. My requirement is to convert some kind1 iso images to raw images. Also i got some .NET application for doing it, but couldn't find java code for doing it.
So i want JPEG itself, not png.
vinod chemmi wrote:i am doing some Iris Biometric study with biometric service providers. My requirement is to convert some kind1 iso images to raw images.
OK, but it's the "raw image" part that I don't follow. Even at 100% quality, a JPEG image is lossy, as explained above, so conversion back to a raw image will result in some loss of detail. There are several proprietary "raw image" protocols around, mostly provided by digital camera companies for use in their own equipment, that contain a lot more information than just the bitmap of pixels, and may even involve some lossless compression.
As for 'kind1', the only pages I've been able to find on Google are for (a) a Chinese snack-food company, or (b) genetic mutation; so I'm not quite sure what either would have to do with biometrics.
I think we need a bit more detail please.
Winston
I agree. Here's the link: http://ej-technologies/jprofiler - if it wasn't for jprofiler, we would need to
run our stuff on 16 servers instead of 3.