Win a copy of Clojure in Action this week in the Clojure forum!
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

bpmn.xml vs bpmn20.xml

 
Sunil Gawade
Greenhorn
Posts: 28
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
We have some workflow having extension as bpmn.xml (sample-activity.bpmn.xml) which are working perfectly in Jboss JBPM. But same are having issue in Activiti as we are not able to install. However workflow with extension .bpmn20.xml (sample-activity.bpmn20.xml) working perfectly in Activiti. Is their any significant difference in extension or is it only for identification ?
 
Tijs Rademakers
author
Ranch Hand
Posts: 45
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Sunil,

It's only a matter of identification. In Activiti you can use the .bpmn and .bpmn20.xml extension.

Best regards,

Tijs
 
Sunil Gawade
Greenhorn
Posts: 28
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I tried to put bpmn.xml file in alfresco activiti where I got error. So instead of putting .bpmn.xml file I generated .bar file which woks fine.
Anyway as long as it just a matter of identification then we can use any file.
 
Tijs Rademakers
author
Ranch Hand
Posts: 45
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Right, you should use the bpmn20.xml extension in Alfresco Activiti. A BAR file is also fine of course.
But it's just a matter of identification.

Best regards,

Tijs
 
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic