A friendly place for programming greenhorns!
Big Moose Saloon
Search
|
Java FAQ
|
Recent Topics
Register / Login
Win a copy of
Arduino in Action
this week in the
General Computing
forum!
A special promo:
Enter your blog post or vote on a blogger to be featured in an upcoming Journal
JavaRanch
»
Java Forums
»
Products
»
Other Open Source Projects
Author
JAMon - implications if Monitor#stop is never reached
myyron latorilla
Greenhorn
Joined: Dec 10, 2009
Posts: 26
posted
Nov 05, 2012 22:16:50
0
Hi,
Not sure if this topic is on the right category, please do advise.
For the subject, I'm wondering what are the implications if Monitor#stop is never reached in the code. Thanks in advance.
Ulf Dittmer
Marshal
Joined: Mar 22, 2005
Posts: 35443
9
posted
Nov 05, 2012 23:21:24
1
Depends on the amount of data you're tracking. You could run out of memory at some point.
Android apps
–
ImageJ plugins
–
Java web charts
steve souza
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jun 26, 2002
Posts: 852
posted
Dec 01, 2012 02:15:26
0
not calling 'stop' has no effect on memory in jamon. The only result is that the 'active' number will continually climb, but the objects themselves will be properly garbage collected when the code goes out of scope.
http://www.jamonapi.com/
- a fast, free open source performance tuning api.
JavaRanch Performance FAQ
I agree. Here's the link:
http://aspose.com/file-tools
subject: JAMon - implications if Monitor#stop is never reached
Similar Threads
Thought of the Day!
Clarify...while....
WA #1.....word association
In reference to notify maybe pausing a thread?
String Equality diffs bw EJB-QL and SQL
All times are in JavaRanch time: GMT-6 in summer, GMT-7 in winter