wood burning stoves 2.0*
The moose likes Other Open Source Projects and the fly likes JAMon - implications if Monitor#stop is never reached Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of Android Security Essentials Live Lessons this week in the Android forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Products » Other Open Source Projects
Bookmark "JAMon - implications if Monitor#stop is never reached" Watch "JAMon - implications if Monitor#stop is never reached" New topic
Author

JAMon - implications if Monitor#stop is never reached

Myyron Murray Latorilla
Ranch Hand

Joined: Dec 10, 2009
Posts: 65

Hi,

Not sure if this topic is on the right category, please do advise.

For the subject, I'm wondering what are the implications if Monitor#stop is never reached in the code. Thanks in advance.
Ulf Dittmer
Marshal

Joined: Mar 22, 2005
Posts: 41147
    
  45
Depends on the amount of data you're tracking. You could run out of memory at some point.


Ping & DNS - my free Android networking tools app
steve souza
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jun 26, 2002
Posts: 860
not calling 'stop' has no effect on memory in jamon. The only result is that the 'active' number will continually climb, but the objects themselves will be properly garbage collected when the code goes out of scope.


http://www.jamonapi.com/ - a fast, free open source performance tuning api.
JavaRanch Performance FAQ
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: JAMon - implications if Monitor#stop is never reached
 
Similar Threads
WA #1.....word association
String Equality diffs bw EJB-QL and SQL
Clarify...while....
In reference to notify maybe pausing a thread?
Thought of the Day!