This week's book giveaway is in the Open Source forum.
We're giving away four copies of RabbitMQ in Depth and have Gavin Roy on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes JBoss/WildFly and the fly likes JBoss AS 7.1 Maven repository Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of RabbitMQ in Depth this week in the Open Source forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Products » JBoss/WildFly
Bookmark "JBoss AS 7.1 Maven repository" Watch "JBoss AS 7.1 Maven repository" New topic
Author

JBoss AS 7.1 Maven repository

Greg Charles
Sheriff

Joined: Oct 01, 2001
Posts: 2868
    
  11

I'm deploying an enterprise web app to JBoss AS 7.1.0.Final, and my pom uses this as a repository:
https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public-jboss/

However, here, it says to use:
http://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public/

Are these both acceptable, or is one preferable? They both seem to exist, but their contents aren't identical.
Jaikiran Pai
Marshal

Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 10425
    
175

I would stick with http://repository.jboss.org/nexus/content/groups/public/ because that's what I am aware of as the public repository. My guess about the first repository is that it contains only JBoss specific Maven artifacts and probably doesn't have 3rd party maven artifacts. I'll check with Paul Gier who manages the JBoss Maven community repos.

[My Blog] [JavaRanch Journal]
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: JBoss AS 7.1 Maven repository